🔗 Share this article

Just two days before the NYC mayoral election, political analyst Michael Lange made a significant electoral prediction – not just who would win overall, but precinct by precinct. The analyst, an expert in elections who grew up in the city, devoted over a decade in left-leaning activism and has become something of a local celebrity recently for his deep dives into municipal statistics and voter surveys.

He released his extremely precise prediction map – accurately predicting that Zohran Mamdani would win although failed to predict Andrew Cuomo’s strong performance – on his newsletter, his platform. Lange possesses a talent for clever terms. He pointed out, for instance, the split between the progressive stronghold, stretching from one neighborhood to Bushwick to Astoria, where he forecasted (correctly) that the left-wing candidate would triumph by large leads, and the “capitalist corridor” on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. There, “the Free Press and financial newspapers surpass the New York Times” in readership and the majority of electors leaned toward the independent, who ran as a conservative-courting independent.

Election Night Patterns and Unexpected Results

How was your election night?

I had to do that since they were adding approximately 200K votes into the tally every few minutes! I was actually somewhat anxious initially: The candidate led the early vote by 12 points, but came two big batches of votes added later and the advantage dropped from 12 to 8%. I was worried.

You know, it was possible where yesterday turned out kind of poorly for Mamdani, where the opponent was going to end up basically doubling his votes from the earlier contest. However Mamdani gained half a million votes to his initial base, and this was critical why he succeeded. He went out and greatly broadened his base from the first round.

Coalition Building

How did Mamdani get those extra votes from?

He built the alliance that the left long aimed for: it’s multiracial, youthful, it’s renters and it’s people squeezed by affordability. He gained significantly with Black and Hispanic voters, everyday New Yorkers, compared to the primary. Plus he further maximized his core of liberal progressives, young leftists, and immigrant groups. He couldn’t have won without expanding his appeal.

He built the alliance that the left always wanted to build: multiracial, youthful, renters and residents squeezed by affordability

Additionally, there were some Trump/Mamdani voters – is that a big trend?

It is a real thing, limited to working-class Latinos, south Asians and Muslims. Voters in ethnic enclaves that supported the former president previously backed Zohran now. But I wouldn’t say he was gaining white working-class voters and Trump loyalists.

Voter Participation and Effects

One of the big stories of the night was the sky-high turnout. Who did that help?

Each candidate. Turnout was much greater than anticipated. I thought we might go over two million, but it’s closer to 2.3 million – that is a huge number of participants. Existed a decent anti-Mamdani block, who were motivated, but his supporters was equally driven, and that sufficed to secure victory.

You predicted he’d get over half the ballots. Is he likely for that?

Currently it appears he’s favored to get over 50%. He has just over 50% but there’s still probably 200,000 votes uncounted at that time. Thus I don’t think certain, but I believe it’s likely, and I wish he achieves it because afterwards no one can say the Republican was a spoiler.

GOP Decline

Curtis Sliwa, the Republican candidate, is the other big story. His support completely collapsed.

He lost any district in any area. Not even Tottenville in Staten Island, which is like an 88% Trump neighborhood. That really surprised me. The independent held Caucasian districts, affluent zones and devout communities, and plus gained all of these conservatives on the island with a high participation. I think there was a lot of strategic balloting by the Republicans. This happened prior to Trump tweeted his support for the candidate, but that definitely helped. It might have changed the outcome unless the winning alliance hadn’t grown.

The “Commie Corridor”

Regarding your much mentioned “commie corridor” – was support for the candidate overwhelming in those areas of Brooklyn and Queens?

I think existed a little dilution of the commie corridor in some areas like Astoria or Greenpoint that have more older white ethnic folks. There, instance, the property owners and homeowners all went for Cuomo. So there existed some opposition. However no, largely the leftist base is a key factor why Zohran won – he scored between 77% and 83% in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Community Support

In the lead-up to the election there was coverage on whether the candidate was making inroads with Jewish New Yorkers. Any indication that he did?

There are areas with many secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – such as Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he did well. However in the affluent districts such as the Manhattan area, his Middle East stance was influential there. Likewise in the moderate communities including Queens neighborhoods, or Bronx areas – they all leaned the independent. Plus, you have newcomers from the former Soviet Union in the borough, who were strongly Cuomo. So I don’t know if existed crazy narrative-busters here, but Mamdani retained left-leaning areas and even parts of the Upper West Side with large leads.

Long-Term Significance

Has Mamdani rewritten what the city represents in politics? Will progressive base become a launch pad for progressive contenders?

Absolutely, it’s not accidental that some of the biggest figures from the left hail from a handful of neighborhoods in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I believe that there will be more of that – candidates will come from these areas to be elevated nationally.

But I think that each urban center in America could develop their own commie corridor. Cities are the centers of progressive influence in America – since they’re young, tenancy is common and they are places where people are crushed by the disparities exist.